Home » Whiteboard » Catherine Malandrino Spring 2014 Collection
Posted on September 15, 2013
Catherine Malandrino Spring 2014 Collection
[Photo Credit: IMAXtree]
75 percent super cute. 25 percent trying too hard.
ETA love the graphic in the thumbnail.
Perfect assessment on your part.
I couldn’t agree more with both of you.
This collection must be called “Hideous to Fabulous- Color me Confused.” or “Still Trying to Sell the Drop-Crotch – Anyone… Anyone…?”
Some interesting pieces. I like the color scheme very much.
Love this collection. Most of it seems very wearable for more than a size 2, love the colors, love the little details and colors that keep the clothes from being too traditional. Although I am not sure I am on board with the Aladdin pants.
I almost want to call this collection: “The Midwest has a Sad” – a lot of the pieces feel kind of dust-bowl chic (a phrase which really shouldn’t exist) with a slice of Americana, Texas beaches, and… drop crotches?
Clothes that actually look summery! I would wear the heck out of that sundress with the sailboat print.
Meh. nothing really bad here, but not that spectacular.
What you wear to the Mommy Blog Awards.
The award winner is the mom that turned her preschool kid’s pajamas into clothes for herself.
OK, but some of the fabrics look like the kind used for children’s pajamas.
I love the colors and the fun proportions, but for the first time this season, was really distracted by how slender some of the models were.
So was I, and then I watched some of the S/S 2013 Paris couture collections. Suddenly these girls look healthy…
Some of these are BEGGING for JLo/Naya Rivera
Not a very cohesive collection in my opinion – I saw some great jersey stuff (that orange top on the 6th model, the red halterneck maxi dress) but also some items which are just totally WTF (drop crotch pants???) and some stuff which is just totally not my style but I can see on a certain type of woman.
Do agree with the commentator below who noted this is wearable for normal sizes, in fact some of it (the sailboat dress, blue striped maxi) would even work very well on taller plus-sizes!
Yeah…no. Not my bag.
I love sailing and sailing adjacent stuff, but lots of these are just hideous.
The navy blue calf length gown with the elaborate neck cut-outs would look fabulous on the RC for a lot of teen stars. I hate all the baggy pants (harem, drop crotch). At least it it is unquestionably a Spring collection with some cute pieces.
The navy blue dress stood out for me as well. Also liked the hot pink gown, but everything else is as underwhelming to me as her Fall collection this year, which was a big freaking nothing.
Do not like.
WAY too literal. All the pieces, except for the cool leather jacket near the top and that one black dress with the cut outs, are basically Catherine Maladrino for KMart.
A little bit nautical, a little bit French Revolution, and a little bit crazy. I like how she did sailboats without going preppy, somehow. The collection is scattered on the whole, but she was definitely having fun with shapes. Mostly fun to look at, and plenty of pieces I’d like to wear.
These are probably the only attractive looking harem pants I’ve seen since that style has had a mini-renaissance for whatever reason.
sorry, but I see the opposite of “attractive” with the harem pants. Fugly. And a weird combo of sister-wife dresses and patriotic red, white and blue. All of the place, and none of them are places I want to go.
I couldn’t pay attention to any of the clothes because these models are grossly underweight. And yes, all the shows utilize models that are very thin and tall and do not represent the average woman, I know. But I feel the weights of the models used in this collection crossed a line Into skeletal. It’s especially visible in the upper arms and the thighs. I do not mean to single out Catherine Malandrino as the only designer/ show guilty of this but here it is the most prominent. Let’s reintroduce “healthy” into our definition of “beauty!”
And the clothes are nice…
I did not like one single bit of this.
From a number of these I get “Catherine Malandrino for Alfred Dunner.”
Yes, many of these skew that way.
Couture just ain’t what it used to be.
That was an every other one collection for me. Loved 50% of it, the other 50% looked like sleepwear to me!
I feel like a lot of this (the eyelet, the sailboat-printed skirts, the airplane-print top) will trickle down to Talbots and that makes me happy.
No. Just no.
I like the color palette, and the play on proportions is interesting, if not always flattering (hammer pants, why are you?).
this collection is pure art! amazing, truly amazing!
The first few looks are very proud of the bleu-blanc-rouge. The sailboat print reminds me of when my stylish ‘grandma’ went to a wedding in Minnesota and came back ridiculing a certain woman who had worn a dress covered in sailboats.
Strangely enough, I actually like the Barbie pink knee-length jumpsuit. But then I got to the dropcrotch one with a boxer’s hood and cringed.
WOW, how exquisite and fun her clothes are!
Oooh, sailboat dress! WANT. Call me crazy, but I kind of want one of those hooded harem-onsies for the weekend. Looks comfy.
I was hating until I saw the pink dress then there were a few more I liked.
She sure likes her red, white, and blue, which sometimes works, and sometimes looks super juvenile. Also, this is the designer who Alexandria clearly a) aspires to be b) should work for or c) desperately copies, depending on your interpretation.
Not my taste.
Did someone from this house get kidnapped and taken to J Mendel mid-collection? Some similar textiles here and there.
This looks very Resort Wear to me. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Just some very specific looks for a general spring line. But that eyelet! Stella for Stars! Give me all the eyelet!!
Love the blue-black ombre. The rest, not so much.
Love the blue & white &bird/fish prints. Make me want to jump on a yacht and sail around the Greek Isles. Now all I need to do is find myself a Mr. (or Ms.) Moneybags.