Sharon Stone Double Shot

Posted on May 22, 2013

Fifty-five, bitches. And telling you all to suck it.


Sharon Stone attends the premiere of ‘Behind The Candelabra’ during The 66th Annual Cannes Film Festival in Roberto Cavalli.

It’s just a tiny bit much, but not so bad that it makes us purse our lips and arch our eyebrows in judgment. She is who she is, and we can’t deny both that she’s got a rocking bod and that this color looks amazing on her. We don’t think that strip that cuts her in half is doing her many favors. It’s distracting and it throws off her proportions. But aside from that, it’s a perfectly Cannes-fabulous look. Attention-seeking, and glamorous. Maybe a tiny bit naughty.

With her next look, there was nothing “a tiny bit” naughty about it:


Sharon Stone attends De Grisogono Party during the 66th Annual Cannes Film Festival in Roberto Cavalli.

Nope, someone was feeling full-on Adult Video Awards naughty. But we can’t applaud this one. It’s just plain tacky. We’ll forgive a lot at Cannes, but wearing a dress that looks like it came from a mannequin in a sex shop who also happened to be modeling the latest in ball-gags is not our idea of the fun, glitzy kind of tacky.  It’s just straight-up trailer park tacky. This has always been the thing with her. She never quite knew when to pull back a little.

We’re just hoping she didn’t get to close to any open flames that night. That thing would evaporate in a flash of chemicals igniting.


[Photo Credit: Getty]

Please review our Community Guidelines before posting a comment. Thank you!

  • Holy TITSCREPANCY, Batman!!!

    • CommenterFormerlyKnownAsR

      For reals. If you’re going to wear something so tacky, for heaven’s sake, at least make it flattering!!

      • drdarke

        Isn’t there a rule in fashion that goes “Tits or legs, not both”?

    • CT14

      The proper undergarments would have made a world of difference.

    • DebbieLovesShoes

      I agree. I actually felt my eyes crossing at the sight.

  • I read the 55, bitches as 55 bitches, like 30 Helens in Kids in the Hall. Like 55 bitches agree- that red dress is pure tacky.

    Let’s ‘k, been awhile.
    Praise to tiity tape!
    Side boob, underboob realness!
    Hairdo by spin class.

    • LipstickForPigs

      30 Helens agree is one of my all-time favorite bits

    • Love the Kids!

      • Kihners unite! We have nothing to do but reclaim cole slaw!

    • Introspective

      “Hairdo by spin class.” How pleasing to my inner snarkiness.

      Thank god Sharon’s taste veers toward tacky most of the time- or else Id feel entirely horrible about how much less hot I am at a cool 20 yrs younger than she is. Hey we all have our achilles heel…

  • AwesomeMargie

    I see nothing but Kim Cattrall, another woman of a certain age, wearing this red dress. Of course, only if Meshach Taylor is in attendance.

    • pop_top

      She is serving up pure Samantha Jones to me.

  • MilaXX

    Dear Madonna & Sharon.,
    Yes you are both still hot, now calm down & put some damn clothes on!

    • aeb1986

      seriously. we’d probably be more envious if they left something to the imagination!

    • gabbilevy

      Seriously, that second dress would probably have looked amazing on her if it hadn’t taken a left turn into tackytown on the side-boob front (side?).

    • Squarah

      Boo! If you don’t like it, don’t look! Down with the idea that any woman should cover up more because someone else doesn’t like it.

      • MilaXX

        They are both dressing just a bit too young and it’s starting to feel desperate. They don’t have to wear nuns clothes, but Madge can’t seem to remember what pants are for and Sharon’s wearing pornstar clothing.

        • DeborahJozayt

          It would be the same as Johnny Depp or Brad Pitt wearing skinny jeans and a deep V-neck wearing Beats by Dre headphones. They’re not fooling anyone!

      • Her tits are OUT, how do we not look?
        (Here at website specifically for looking and discussing)

      • TheAmericaness

        Oh, no woman has to do anything! I also can’t be stopped from calling them pathetic. 😀

  • RebeccaKW

    She looks damn good. I like Dress 1 on her, but Dress 2 is wack-a-doo. Maybe it wouldn’t be so bad if half her right boob weren’t hanging out.

    She is a woman who I always thought looked better with short (pixie) hair.

  • Sugarbeetle

    She is huge in France. HUGE. When I was there a year ago, she had a movie coming out and it was advertised all over the Metro stations. I kind of love her. The red dress is a polyester nightmare though. But, I’d kill to have her body.

    • Fordzo

      Are her movies in French?

      • Sugarbeetle

        You know what? I don’t know! I actually think they’re subtitled! But she’s got to know some French by now, right?

        • Fordzo

          Probably only dirty words.

    • 3boysful

      You could probably buy it (the body). As someone near her age, I can tell you those boobs have seen some lifting.

      • I agree in a way. As someone near her age–on the other side–I know that plastic surgery can only fix so much. Most women must exercise and watch their weight. There is no magic, even for the rich and famous. I respect a sexy woman of any age who has the confidence to cover up.

  • Underboob!!!!!

    • cbt22

      Underboob, sideboob, everywhere a boob, boob. Old MacDonald…

      • Hee hee!
        Or perhaps a Saturday morning cartoon show. Underboob!!! Where a mild mannered film superstar has a secret hidden identity as the. Nemesis of restraint and quiet good taste.

        • MilaXX

          Underboob, Missing Pants, two seafaring creatures trying to find clothing.

  • Buffy

    She has a great body but I really don’t need to see her side boob or even her sternum.

  • VicD

    Both of these are tacky, and the amount of jewelry is serious overkill. There is so much jewelry, and the pieces are so large, that it just ends up looking ridiculous. Unlike Jane Fonda’s perfect accentuation of her pink dress with one large stunning sparkler … Sharon needs to take a lesson in how it outta be done.

  • Fordzo

    55 or not, she looks like she was rode hard and put away wet.

  • marlie

    She looks amazing in the first dress (that color!), but agree that the belt-like detail does weird things to her proportions. The second dress is giving her a major titscrepancy, and it just doesn’t FIT in the whole torso area. The slit-up-to-there doesn’t help.

    ETA: I kept making apologies for the second dress, but upon second and third review of the dress, I just couldn’t get behind my own comments.

  • quiltrx

    Love the first one, except I agree about the horizontal strip. It makes an illusion that her tits are actually way down there.
    And OPRAH SAVE US from the titscrepancy of the second dress! One is migrating, smushed, down to her bellybutton…and the other is escaping under her arm. She looks a bit chemically-enhanced-pleased-with-herself.

  • adi

    you are a hollywood star ,

    • CB

      It’s a bit too sloppy, but I kind of love that she can run her fingers through her hair on the red carpet, i.e. that it’s not a helmet.

      • adi

        it’s those higlights that makes me scream,they are too bright & looks really i don’t know? … cheap ?

  • Tr16ia

    Now, if she was wearing Jessica Chastain’s Liz Taylor necklace (see other post) instead of this emerald/diamond mess = perfection.

    I don’t mind the watermelon pink gown either, IF the cut out on the right side wasn’t there, nor the thigh high slit.

    • 3boysful

      Re – emeralds. Not that I want to turn down real jewelry, but that one needs a sedate black strapless gown to look good.

  • alyce1213

    Maybe she should have stayed home this year. Both dresses are ugly and super-tacky.
    The first does not flatter and the jewelry is all wrong. The second is far worse, I can’t even begin . . .

    They look like she picked them up at Limpasse, a really cheesy sexy gown boutique on W 8th St in NYC, where I stop in from time to time just for laughs.

    • VictoriaDiNardo

      I always wonder who keeps that place in business…. ( okay, that was a joke, but actually, I always DO wonder. These are a little on the covered-up side for Limpasse! )

      • alyce1213

        You live here! You’re right, these are downright demure for Limpasse. As to how they stay in business, I wonder that myself, but I guess there is no shortage of bad taste anywhere, even NYC (maybe especially NYC).

        • VictoriaDiNardo

          Lived around the corner until last year – now I’m upstate but I still stay in the area when I’m in town. Sorry to see the shoes stores go though – all my best leopard disco booties came from Eighth Street!

          • alyce1213

            Funny, I was going to say something about the demise of the shoes stores. There are very few left. 8th St in general has been a bit depressed, and I’m hoping it comes back — it really used to be a hub. I lived on Washington Place forever (really, I’m old), but moved farther downtown a few years ago.

  • Diego!

    Sharon is a Goddess!!!! I love huh!!! And I love both looks, the second one is tacky, yes, but if you forgave JLo at Billboard Awards, this is like a little mischief of Sharon. You shine with glamour girl!

    • She’s desperate and tacky and I LOVE her for it. I wish I knew her, I suspect she is crazy fun.

      • Diego!

        I agree. She must be.

  • kirkyo

    I appreciate that her face looks normal and has not been stretched, tucked and botoxed into oblivion.

    • makeityourself

      The tucking has had years to settle in. But yes, her face looks “normal,” and the botox isn’t overdone.

  • That hair… urgh!!!

  • Anniebet

    First -blue dress okay. Gorgeous necklace. Hair and makeup for a pool party.

    Second – srsly? All kinds of wrong going on here. It looks like she decided to slip the right strap of the dress under her arm. Hate that bracelet with a passion – is it a gilded dog head? Hair and makeup for a pool party.

    She’s still beautiful.

  • YoungSally

    The red dress looks like she had a few too many cocktails in dress one and put her head through the wrong hole in the red one.

  • 909girl601world

    Um. Is that not her vagina I see in the first picture??? No ma’am!

    • Fordzo

      Probably not, as she would need to be on her back with her legs in stirrups, probably with a speculum inserted, for you to see her vagina.

      • 909girl601world

        Pretty sure I meant that in the colloquial sense. But for those of us who require technicality in all things: is that not her mons pubis I see in the first picture???

        • Fordzo

          Just making sure you knew the difference. I’m pretty sure there are some men (and, possibly, some women) who hang out around here who are completely unfamiliar with lady parts.

          And to answer your question, I don’t think so. I *think* it’s just a shadow. But, then, this is Sharon Stone, and I believe she is completely unfamiliar with lady undergarments.

        • MilaXX

          I’m gonna say no. I can’t get a close up on the bottom, but on the top it’s look like what we see are the reflections of the beading. She’s wearing a clingy dress, and probably not underwear, so you get the outline, but we’re not seeing anything. Besides, most of Hollywood is waxed so there wouldn’t be any hair to see.

  • carnush

    Love her hair and makeup. The blue dress is stunning.

  • I wish she wasn’t trying so hard

  • mjude

    agree about the red dress but other wise she looks fab & real

  • decormaven

    Was she afraid to leave the jewelry in the room safe, and just decided to wear it all upon her person? The amount of gold on her wrist in the second look is beyond beyond. And underboob. No, no, no…

  • crash1212

    Red dress awful and possibly flammable, but I gotta say…she’s a beautiful woman. Her face is gorgeous and the rest of her ain’t bad either. Rock on Sharon Stone!

  • nannypoo

    She’s looking pretty but that red dress is just sleazy. The first one is better but the wandering waistline is bugging me. It looks like she’s developed that poochy middle-aged midriff that makes it impossible to find your waist. Ask me how I know.

  • Heather

    “…wearing a dress that looks like it came from a mannequin in a sex shop who also happened to be modeling the latest in ball-gags…”
    Think I’ll try that for my next date. 🙂
    Awesome. Both Tlo, and SS.
    And, can’t WAIT to see “Behind the Candelabra.”

  • What is that smell? Oh, it’s Sharon. She’s doused in Desperation again. It’s her signature scent.

  • jilly_d


  • Tatiana Luján

    No no no to underboob. In both cases.

  • Sharon looks better in the red dress than the blue dress. She’s too old to let her ta-ta’s hang out there. The blue dress is too strong of a color. Her skin looks old. Her face looks old. Her face looks great in the red. I know that’s the opposite of what you say. There is a different of night and day with the two colors.

  • LOVE the jewelry on the second look, though. I don’t get in the first why she is pairing the green and the blue. Not a pretty color combo to my eye.

  • stayl

    I’ve always liked Sharon, her slightly bonkers sense of humor and the way she used to dress several years ago. I love the gowns she used to wear to the Oscars or Cannes. Today, I only like the jewelry with the red dress. What happened?

  • jw_ny

    i feel so sorry for her boobs in that red dress!

    they are both perfectly her style, and not that that’s a good or bad thing really…I just like how she owns it. Her body, face and hair look good…credit to her plastic surgeon.

    • conniemd

      You think she’s had facelift or botox. To me her skin looks near her age. She has parentheses around her mouth, wrinkles in her neck and at the corner of he eyes. I think her face looks good.

  • NoGovernmentName

    The red one just does not fit! She does look great, though. Whoever is doing her work is earning that $$$.

  • Still can. Probably shouldn’t.

  • ashtangajunkie

    I have fallen in complete lust with her necklace(s) in the first look. Hello, lover.

  • Side boob and underboob in the same outfit? Unbelievable!!

  • Patricia Gillett

    Honey, we all saw the movie, there is no need to forever define your personal style choices around a lack of underwear. Mix it up.

    I dig the bracelet on the second dress though.

  • Kirsten Kirsten

    I love her face. She looks real! And smokin hot.

  • RL McGruder

    You know, I’ve let her crazy get in my way. I’d forgotten what a supremely beautiful woman she is, and that blue dress just sets her face off beautifully.

  • TSkot

    She auditioning for Real Housewives? Tacky tacky tacky.

  • racrobin

    Not sure if this counts as body snarking or not, but I think her face looks fabulous. She looks youthful and joyous, but also looks natural – laugh lines, crows feet, and all. Snaps to you for that alone, Ms. Sharon.

  • demidaemon

    I can get behind the first dress, but not the hair. It’s looking a little Ke$ha-y there.

    The second dress is just a big, ol’ NO. But, her hair looks infinitely better.

  • Well, I really like the first look. And I think she’s looking more like herself (in terms of face) than she did for some time. Less strict, less shiny, less plastic-y, more herself.

  • Knightley

    Is there a closeup of the bracelet on her wrist? It looks interesting…clearly not with that dress of course, but I think it might be a cougar, which if so…hahahaha. Well played, Sharon Stone. Well played.

  • mmc2315

    I’ll confess that I’m surprised how much I like the blue dress with necklace on her. The red? Screech. No.

  • CatherineRhodes

    Does she have a mirror? Does she know her boobs are on the diagonal?

  • Ah, wonderful to have good genes and facial structure.

  • KAO TV

    Double WERQ for me!

  • judybrowni

    Also: titscrepancy in the red Frederick’s of Hollywood.

    One of ’em hanging lower, and smashed.

    And then there’s the underboob.

  • kalisa

    I think she looks every bit her age. She has wrinkles around her boobs FFS.
    <— 47, bitches

  • Flash of chemicals igniting…I love it.

  • PeaceBang

    She needs more elegant hair and make-up for the first look. The second look is just — Belle Watling goes to Cannes.

  • guest2visits

    These kind of revealing selections don’t really showcase her features in the best way; they just throw it all out there. We all age and hopefully we will share our still wonderful and amazing bodies for the very special person (people?) who know it’s value most. It seems a bit too intimate to be viewing Sharon’s 55yr old cleavage, bellybutton, nipples, or under-boobs at close range. No?
    These gowns look like they came straight out of her closet 20, 30 years ago. She’s beautiful of course, but I think she would have looked a lot better in something made to respect her current figure – these are coming off as garish and satirical.

  • Tuneful54

    The blast of Titsen and navy blue thong (I think–in the first one–looking like the carpet doesn’t match the drapes) make Heidi Klum look modest and ladylike. Gurl, anyone can go to the gym, no matter how old they are. What’s rarer is class with age. See La Fonda and La Mirren.

  • the_valkyrie

    I don’t care for either dress, but I love the fact that she has wrinkles, you know, like other normal human beings

  • TooTrue2b

    She looks so stunningly beautiful in the first close up in the blue. I won’t speak of the second dress and it’s crimes.