Penelope Cruz for Harper’s Bazaar

Posted on April 11, 2012

Penelope shows off her “SEXY HAIR” for Harper’s. She also shows off her “BOOBS” but they didn’t get a cover credit. Apparently, her hair has a better publicist than her boobs.

 

Penelope Cruz featured in the May 2012 issue of Harper’s Bazaar magazine in couture dresses photographed by Terry Richardson and styled by Andrew Richardson.

Armani Privé Spring 2012 Couture Collection

Givenchy Spring 2012 Couture Collection

Chanel Spring 2012 Couture Collection

Versace Spring 2012 Couture Collection

 

The dresses are great, but doesn’t her face look washed out and underdone (in terms of makeup)? Maybe it’s the pale lip. Honestly, we have no idea why we’re obsessing over lip color lately. It’s not that she can’t rock a pale lip – she looks pretty good in the Versace shot – but we don’t think it quite works with every look.

And we don’t jump on the Terry Richardson hate-wagon as often as everyone else on the internet – not because we disagree with the sentiments but because it’s a horse that’s been beaten to death – but there is no editorial less imaginative and less interesting to look at than a celebrity standing against a white backdrop. We hope they paid him minimum wage for his non-efforts.

But it’s true; she really does have “SEXY HAIR,” does she not?

 

[Photo Credit: Terry Richardson for harpersbazaar.com, style.com]

    • BrooklynBomber

      I don’t know, The poses look very amateur. I don’t who’s responsible for that – her, the magazine, the photographer, etc. But especially the Chanel & Versace – they look like a beginning model’s test shots.

      • lilazander

         I agree with the cliche nature of the poses, but I think the Chanel and Versace look great on her body. But the backdrop is so mundane that it ruins the effect. I would like to see her working that Chanel number on RC.

      • NC_Meg

        Totally agree. The Chanel pose is especially odd.

        • Candigirl1968

          The Chanel shot looks like Penelope is teenage model wannabe who bought a dress for her book (which she would promptly return to the mall afterwards), went to the garage, and had her brother take a picture.  It’s that weak.

          On a happier note, PC’s hair looks fabulous. 

    • Judy_J

      and perfect skin!  She looks adorable in that little Chanel dress.  It’s quite a different look for her, I think.

      • kimmeister

        Exactly – she doesn’t look va-va-va-voom in the Chanel, but still totally fetching.

    • VioletFem

      Gorgeous pictures, not because of Terry’s “skill” (seriously what is his appeal?), but because SHE is drop dead gorgeous. 

    • sarahofalessergod

      I hope they paid Penelope well for having to work with Richardson.  Although it’s almost impressive how he can make such a stunning woman look so uninteresting.

      • mountainFashionista

         All I could see, starting from the cover photo, is Lea Michelle.  I think it’s the TR effect.

        • NC_Meg

          I thought it was Lea Michele from the thumbnail on Facebook.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Irene-Wroclai/733770581 Irene Wroclai

            That was my first thought too! 

        • joe_tey83

           I genuinely thought it was Lea Michele looking at the cover.

        • girliecue

          I’m pretty sure somewhere in Celebrityland, Lea Michele is shrieking with envy.

        • http://twitter.com/foodycatAlicia foodycatAlicia

          Lea Michelle only wishes she could be so beautiful. But yeah – the SEXY HAIR and the pose was exactly that.

    • Patricia Hoffman

      I think she looks good in the cover shot, but I also had a split second of thinking it was Lea Michelle.  So….good for her genes, but bad for her celebrity? 

      • http://www.facebook.com/charlotte.horseman Charlotte Horseman

        I saw Lea too….and I think you are right!! 

        • mountainFashionista

           Once again, I should read before posting!  (see above…)

    • kathryn shaw-cutter

      Um, what is going on with pic #4?  Does she have something in her mouth?  I have been staring at it for quite a while and need an explanation.

      • suz72350

        It’s bothering me, too. I can’t figure out what they did to her mouth. 

      • janedonuts

        I was wondering too – it looks like a metal pacifier! Yikes.

      • http://twitter.com/Wint3rhart Winterhart

        I keep thinking that it looks like the moth from Silence of the Lambs.

      • out for a walk

        I think they have an oversized silver ornate nose ring on her, and then dark lipstick. What I can’t tell you is WHY.

      • MK03

        And the basketball just sitting on the floor. Just…what?

      • makeityourself

        My first thought was “What the hell does Stella Tennant have in her mouth?”  She’s either turning into Hannibal Lechter or that’s a gold pacifier.  So weird.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessica-TallGirl-Freeman/1043623567 Jessica TallGirl Freeman

      The shot of her in the Chanel seems so out of place since she’s giving us super sexy in every other shot, and that looks like some school photo or something.  But yes, that hair.  Gah. 

      Anyone know WTF is in the models mouth in the Givenchy shot?? Or is it make up??

      • http://twitter.com/Deac82 Mike M.

         Its nose jewelry.  Its hard to see in this shot, but its much more noticeable in the other pictures of the Givenchy collection.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=610791985 Aniela Marie Perry

        It freaks me out. The model looks like a cenobite. I’m going to have nightmares.

    • http://joyouslifesf.wordpress.com Kiltdntiltd

      I do love the Hayworhtesque pose in the Givenchy gown, Though the uber-matchy shoes would not have been my choice.  The Chanel shot is just dorky looking, and not in a good way.  Somehow I don’t think she’s a “hook yer thumbs in yer skirt” kinda gal.

      • schadenfreudelicious

        agreed, that pose is far too “yeehaw/hoedown” for a Chanel dress…

        • http://joyouslifesf.wordpress.com Kiltdntiltd

           And the feeling evoked by the pose and image is totally at odds with the rest of the spread.  Plus, its not an especially flattering shot of either her or the dress.

          • formerlyAnon

             Awww, but she’s so cuuuute (imagine annoying squeaky voice) in that shot that I’d say Penelope’s people won out over Chanel’s people, there.

          • Oze R.

            Non-flattering indeed. Only Richardson’s tacky sense of lightning can make this Chanel look cheap. Really. it looks like a cheap-trying-to-be-chic prom dress.

      • norseofcourse

        Since the runway model’s doing it too, I’m going to assume the Chanel has tiny thumb pockets built in. Been lookin’ for some formal wear with thumb pockets, yep.

        • http://joyouslifesf.wordpress.com Kiltdntiltd

           Oh thumbpockets are SO on trend.

      • kimmeister

        What bothers me about the uber-matchy shoes is that they are making her feet look disproportionately huge!

    • nannypoo

      I don’t know if it’s sexy, but it sure is big. And I think her makeup looks good, especially the lip color. And especially compared to the model with the basketball. What’s up with that?

      • kimmeister

        HAHAHA I never even noticed the basketball, I was too repelled by the nose jewelry to look further!  Whaddup indeed.

        • TheDivineMissAnn

          That nose jewelry looks like Hitler’s mustache.  Couple that with the way they styled the model’s hair…..

          • reebism

            Oh my god, that was nose jewelry? I was wondering whether her teeth had been blackened or if that genuinely was a Hitler ‘stache. 

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WKSM57KFWUGRMKPDUW4SPL3GDM Kathryn

      She looks so good in all those clothes.  

    • jblaked

      I love me some Penelope Cruz – and she looks great here, but the cover pic looks a little like the Glee chick – cant remember her real name – the one who plays Rachel Berry. No?

    • http://twitter.com/siao siao

      She looks gorgeous in the Versace.

    • howdoilook

      Definitely underdone for all that couture. 

    • raininmai

      Penelope Cruz is strikingly beautiful. And the clothes aren’t bad either. I especially like the Givenchy piece from the back, but what is with the model’s face?  She sort of looks like Hannibal Lecter in his mask.

    • Sartorial_She

      The photo of the Givenchy model FREAKS ME OUT!

      I don’t have any great love for Penelope, but I’ve gotta admit she is one of the most breathtakingly beautiful women I’ve seen.

      • Anathema_Device

         I know. I literally recoiled from my computer in horror.

      • Kayceed

        Me too – and i’m not loving the Versace model with the five o’clock shadow, either.

        • kimmeister

          Ewwww, I didn’t even notice!

        • MK03

          It’s nice to see that WIllam’s doing all right for himself.

      • MK03

        It looks like a deleted scene from a Saw movie.

    • http://www.facebook.com/charlotte.horseman Charlotte Horseman

      She is super beautiful, but it’s all undone by seeing the sh%t Givenchy nose ring!!!!  I hope I never see it again!!

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessica-TallGirl-Freeman/1043623567 Jessica TallGirl Freeman

        Is that what that is….a nose ring?  That is some scary shit for sure.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1129137319 Paula Pertile

      I like the medieval basketball uniform. On the model. It looks like a totally different (and way less interesting) dress from the side, and with the sexy hair. Nothing against her personally, just saying.

    • http://twitter.com/arodenha Alli

      Ugh ugh ugh I’m so sick of Terry Richardson continuing to get fashion work. Personal grossness aside, all of these overlit covers look alike!

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6RS6NLL44AED3E4QWIYTDQGU6I Psy_Chick

        As a photographer, I am personally offended that this man keeps getting work. He overuses the flash. Is he using the flash that comes with the camera? This isn’t Instagram! It’s a magazine that people pay actual folding money for. White backgrounds are fine for catalogs, but not for a fashion editorial. Give me something interesting to look at, and I don’t mean “make every woman look like she’s 12 and wants me.” Ugh.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1124162729 Igor Buarque

      The Chanel dress looks unexpensive and the Givenchy remind me Jesus Estrada gown made out of “chocolate crocodile” fabric.

    • funkypeanut

      The Chanel shot looks like a candid taken after she had a bit too much at her cousin’s wedding. What a waste of a gorgeous woman and beautiful clothes.

      What’s up with the Givenchy model? Couldn’t she get out of gym class? And how much did they have to pay Queen Amidala’s makeup artist to come to the high school for the shoot?

    • http://theargiehome.blogspot.com/ Gus Casals

      Love her in the Givenchy, hate her in the Chanel. I say that the washed out effect is bad photography ( hi Terry, I’m tired of you) and not poor styling. 

    • Alicia Campbell

      She looks like a softball player in that Chanel dress – hair and all

    • Anathema_Device

      She is rocking the sexy disco-diva ’70s look to be sure. All these dresses look better on her than on the models, especially that terrifying Givenchy couture pic. 

      Also, I think you’re focused on lip color lately because so many people are doing it wrong. I don’t mind the nude lip on Cruz here. It has enough color to it so as not make her lips disappear. My pet peeve is flesh-colored lips. Freaks me the hell out.

    • DeborahLipp

      That dress looks a lot better without the basketball.

    • IAmJ

      I’ll unabashedly admit she’s my girl crush and I know she’s capable of looking much, much better than this photo shoot makes it seem. Not crazy about the styling, but she’s gorgeous nonetheless. I like her Versace look, but the shots are average at best.

    • MilaXX

      Her hair looks greats but I’m not really liking any of these shots. The cover shot cuts her boobs off at a weird angle so they don’t look sexy at all. The way the Chanel is styled it looks like a prom dress and I think she has a slamming body but the Versace looks too short and young on her.

      • guestela

         I agree. And I think the Versace is also too small on her bust.

        • ballerinawithagun

          I was wondering when someone would post about the horrible fit of the the cups on the Wonder Woman by Versace.

    • fringebenefit

      Penelope upstages any and all models. ZOWIE!

    • bitchybitchybitchy

      I confess to having a girl crush on Penelope-ever since Vicky Cristina Barcelona.  I think she looks fab-especially in the Versace.

    • Lindsay McCarthy

      The last model picture is freaking me out. She looks like one of those “This is what your baby would look like” photos, using a picture of Kim Kardashian and Guilianna Rancic. Can’t look away.

    • TheOriginalLulu

      Enh, I have never understood her appeal. She does have a great head of hair, though.
      Am I the only one getting a Brittany Murphy vibe from that last shot? Am I nuts?

      • kimmeister

        Now that you mention it, I can see Brittany Murphy in that shot.  I think it’s just the facial expression with the downturned lips.

        • TheOriginalLulu

          But it’s there, right? So weird.
          I know PC looks nothing like Brittany Murphy (RIP), so it’s odd. I know we all have complained about excessive photoshopping to no end, but it bugs when it is used so liberally that one person ends up resembling someone that they definitely do not resemble. Perhaps if they had left her pores and the lines in her face alone, she would look more like herself.

    • giiiirrrr

      I’m a bandwagon jumper–why does Terry Richardson even get his phone calls answered?  Penelope looks insanely gorgeous in the Givenchy.  The rest, meh.  Don’t like the light hair or the light lip on her.  I don’t know how they managed to make her hair look thin on the cover, but it does.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GQIN74TNNQROY5JFPOWWBGJWEM andy

      Hate away, fellas. That guy’s a skeevy bastard.

    • http://www.thirteen.org/downton-abbey/category/the-downton-dish/ Gotham Tomato

      Are she and Lea Michelle morphing? 

      –GothamTomato

      • mommyca

        I didn’t see your comment, but I just posted the same thing….hahahhaa

    • SapphoPoet

      She’s a gorgeous woman, no doubt about it. But these are some very strange photos–they all look rather amature-ish. And what, for the love of Mike, is going on with the model’s face in the picture with the basketball? It’s as if someone scribbled a mustache and Van Dyke beard over her face in the photo. Or is it a mouthpiece? Very distracting, at any rate.

    • MzzPants

      Meh….not feelin’ it.

    • marilyn

      I am starting to confuse her with Raquel Welch.

    • StillGary

      She is gorgeous! THis post reminded me of something funny, I saw this snippet on the CNN website a few days ago — something about actresses who love their big noses — they said literally said “big noses” — and showed pictures of Streep, Parker, Cher and Penelope here — so I’ve been studying her nose — so that’s big?

      • alyce1213

        It’s not really BIG, but it’s prominent, and unusually shaped and positioned, in terms of “standard” beauty.
        You really have to see a profile or close 3/4 shot to appreciate.
        Very interesting nose, really. It makes her unique.
        P.S.  The shots above, are probably touched up *just a bit.*

    • Laura Valentine

      I love Penelope, but my first reaction to these pics was “…wow, she is NOT a model, is she?”  Like she just can’t work those clothes or the camera the way I want her to.

      Richardson’s tired-ass white background sure doesn’t help; maybe she’d’ve done a better job with something to react to?

    • In_Stitches

       Loving the cover and the shot in the Givenchy.  The Versace makes her look a bit thick-waisted which the Chanel proves to no longer be the case.  The Chanel, well…Chanel always looks like old lady slutwear, infused with the sensibilities of the high school to me. 

    • mommyca

      I don’t know, but at a quick glance of the cover I thought it was Lea Michelle….. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=502620391 Trish Reed

      Her pose in the Chanel gown looks like her head has been spun around and we are actually looking at the back of the dress (apparently she also has Barney Stinson’s fantasy “back boobs”).  All I can think of is “exorcist in Chanel”.  Creepy.  

    • Sophie Collier

      Can someone please tell me why Terry Richardson is considered a genius?  I honestly don’t see it.  

    • quiltrx

      Her hair looks like a nightmare in the Chanel shot…very incongrous with the rest.  I really love her hair on the cover, especially.

    • http://profiles.google.com/valencia.lucia87 Lucía Valencia

      I think she just looks fantastic in all of those, especially when she’s smiling. But then again, I have the biggest girl crush on her, so I’m biased.

    • unbornfawn

      You are right on this one, she really could use a stronger lip color. Her hair is amazing. How many of us have tried to get it to look like that and failed miserably? She’s a beautiful woman. Don’t like that the cover shot made her beautiful boobs look droopy.

    • Glammie

      I like the dress choices and the hair.  Stylist was on the job–I’m even fine with the make-up, but, boy, *boring* photos and I don’t know this stuff as well as others, but it seems like there’s a lot of Photoshop–as in her real shoulder’s are a bit broader–she’s a petite woman, but her image has been played with in such a way that these aren’t her normal proportions.

    • judybrowni

      Okay, I get it, we’re not supposed to comment on the models.

      But surely, when Givenchy has styled one as a fetish Hitler…

    • lonepear

      Gorgeous woman, gorgeous dresses, and yes, sexy hair; pity that everyone else involved managed to shit the whole thing up.

    • formerlyAnon

      She looks so good here, I can’t think why I’ve been thinking of her as ‘not as attractive as she used to be.’

      The lighting (and probably several other technical things I don’t know enough to recognize) is doing NOTHING for that Chanel dress, but she’s flat out adorable in that shot.

    • gabbilevy

      The Givenchy is my fave, the rest are kinda meh. Which is tragic, when you consider the gorgeous materials TR had to work with (dresses and lady in the dresses)

    • http://twitter.com/connectinglines Me Again

      What the hell is up with her pose in the picture with the Chanel outfit?  Is she just proving to us that the dress has pockets (like the runway model is doing too)?

    • alyce1213

      There’s something manic in the Chanel photograph that looks like a drunken mug shot.
      Great work, TR.

    • terekirkland

      Boringest. Editorial. Evezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

    • Thathoodwink

      The 4th picture of the model in the Givenchy gown. What in the world is going on with her mouth?

      • Thathoodwink

        I looked it up. It’s “facial jewelry”. What looks like a bunch of loop earrings hanging from the middle of the nose, covering the mouth.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3DWDLRZCK3MZICZKYJDR55MC4Y soren

      Her make up is fine.  She looks washed out because that’s Terry Richardson’s “style.”

    • jw_ny

      Sexy hair indeed!  I like the subtle lip, but agree that makeup can/should be switched up with the outfit.  Speaking of which, you’d think Penelope could wear everything…but that Chanel dress is not her dress, and her hair is not so sexy there either….

    • http://profiles.google.com/anplica Anplica Fiore

      She looks like she’s going to prom in that Chanel dress…

    • holdmewhileimnaked

      that givenchy dress is a knockout, better on the model, even better on the model had the model not had a death’s head moth in her mouth & been paired w/ a basketball. for no reason, apparent or subliminal.

      the rest of these shots are fine. eh, terry richardson, he just remembers his father’s world & thinks we are still living in it. & he has, & makes, enough money that he doesnt have to disabuse himself of the illusion.

      • guest2visits

        Who the H is this Terry Richardson that everyone’s disliking so much ?

    • abigail3

      She just looks different somehow. Nose tweak? What is it? It’s driving me crazy.

    • Pants_are_a_must

      Terry fucking Richardson, doing half-assed work on this month’s unfortunate fashion magazine sheep.

    • Aurumgirl

      She has great hair but any pallor and overexposure is the sole responsibility of the photographer.  Who is as boring as F*CK.

    • http://twitter.com/#!/Space_Kitty Space Kitty

      That last picture is coming with me the next time I get my hair did.

      golden highlights, not *yellow streaks* for the love of all that’s good…

    • Pterodactyl111

      What the heck is with the model’s lips in that photo with the basketball??

    • http://twitter.com/LOfficielEbony TheVeryLivingEND

      That hair!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1344314000 Anne Meek White

      The editorial is bleh and her hair is big. Enh. Not feeling it, sorry Penny.

    • Pannyx

      This whole editorial just seems lazy to me. I feel there were much better pieces from the collection that she could have been dressed in. I’m not really a fan of any of these dresses, especially when compared to the rest of the collections they came from. And where’s the styling? Were there no stylists on hand to add accessories or maybe suggest that the white background is doing nothing to enhance the look?

    • Daenyx

      No, her face looks like it isn’t *completely* covered in makeup.  Which I rather like!

    • guest2visits

      God she’s beautiful. She should look trashy in that overly bodacious Versace; but she just looks amazing.

    • snarkykitten

      holy mother of god, whatever they have on the model’s mouth in the Givenchy photo is creepy!

    • http://cheekypinky.wordpress.com/ Rebecca

      Richardson has a thing for washed-out looking women.

      But Penelope has amazing hair–I wonder if she and Kathy Middleton exchange tips?

    • Rand Ortega

      Damn, she’s luscious!
      Just watched “Broken Embraces” for the 90th time last night. She knocks me out!
      21st Century Sophia Loren.
      Not that 20th Century Sophia is any less fabulous.

    • http://twitter.com/jessicapippin Jessica Pippin

      She is my favorite. Love the shot of her smiling. Definitely could’ve been a more creative editorial, but she looks great. 

    • Warmheartedgirl Seattle

      Sexy hair, sexy body, sexy lips – the woman is sex on a stick.  And she looks better in every single outfit than the models. LOVE the Givenchy.  Of course, that one is styled so badly on the runway that I can’t even look at it!!

    • LesYeuxHiboux

      Get your thumbs out of that Chanel’s waistband, you bad girls! Clothes look pretty, she looks hot, but this is dull as dishwater. What is in that Givenchy model’s mouth? Is it a gilded pacifier, or a gilt-lip pucker?

    • sleah_in_norcal

      i loved that armani prive on the runway, but it does nothing for me on the cover.  what happened to the gorgeous green?  the givenchy, on the other hand, looks light years better on penny.  the versace is beautiful as an art object, but it would look uncomfortable on anyone.

      her hair looked sexier to me when it was long.  and i usually hate pale lips, but here they’re not that pale.  just sort of neutral/natural.  

    • http://profiles.google.com/scaponigro Sarah Caponigro

      Hate the Chanel dress.

    • piecesofconfetti

      At first I didn’t notice who photographed these images, but I thought to myself, “These look like generic Terry Richardson snooze photos. If you make Penelope Cruz look generic, you’re doing it wrong.” Then I saw that it was Terry Richardson. Put me on the hate wagon, for sure.

    • NurseEllen

      Chanel as gym wear?  I don’t think so.  And while I am fully aware that runway presentations are just as much about effect, affect, styling, shock value, and photo opportunities as they are about the clothing, I have to say: I hate the nose ring/pacifier on the Givenchy, I hate the dunce cap on the Armani model, I hate the hairstylng & feathers on the Chanel model, and I hate the shoes on the Versace model.  Together, they take the “haute” out of “haute couture”.

      Penelope, on the other hand, is my pick for World’s Most Gorgeous Woman.  She is just fab.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_F73LIJ3SJGI5AJQMXMWXCKILHI Pamela

      I wish MY face looked that washed out and underdone!!

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/W7A5N4G7FDTV5U2KOHBVSB55XI Basket

      In my opinion Cruz has one trick, looking sexy.  I am so yawn about her. 

    • bellafigura1

      Is the model (who looks a lot like Stella Tennant) in the Givenchy sporting a pacifier?  Or a robot mouth?  What’s going on there?

      • PeaceBang

        I was thinking Hannibal Lector Mask For Girls. Awful. Like some medieval torture device for uppity hausfraus.

      • guest2visits

        I know. Horrifying.  Some one needs therapy over at Givenchy. Looks like a kick in the head for women; covering
        the mouth.   Didn’t some ancient civilization put coins in mouths of their dead ?
        Probably looked better than this.

    • http://twitter.com/annaria Ria V

      You can bet Lea Michele is gonna have these photos on her wall. 

    • sid123

      the cover shot looks like her boobs were photoshopped to look like a butt.

    • butter nut

      i’m so tired of the terry richardson style editorial.  it’s the same damn thing every time.  and each time he manages to take beautiful celebrities, in world-class hair, makeup, clothes & styling, and make them look the worst they could possibly look.  here’s a major sex-bomb actress in chanel, looking like a washed out, awkward kid from around the corner, who has no clue how to pose or work her face.  the fault certainly does not lay with penelope.  everyone knows she’s beyond flawless.  it’s this shitty, over-hyped creepoid photographer that needs to stop getting gigs already, cause his shit does indeed truly stink.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2P2ANLRZ6YAVGONA36I2AQJYGI VicD

      She appears to have yoga hair in the Chanel shot.  Plus, just hate the boobs peeking out on the magazine cover – would have loved it if not for that (those).  Distracting in a bad way.

    • Dani Colman

      I’ve been staring in horror at the cover shot for minutes now, because I’m pretty sure boobs just don’t do that.  Especially Penelope Cruz’s beautiful boobs.  Her boobs look like a bum. 

      Penelope Cruz is ass over tits.

      And it’s a crying shame, because I’m sure Penelope Cruz has a beautiful bum that no one would object to seeing.  Just not on her chest.

    • ccm800

      these look like preshoot snapshots.

    • TieDye64

      She’s beautiful, but barely recognizable in a couple of the pics. Still, I wouldn’t mind looking like her on her worst day/photo shoot.

    • http://twitter.com/Neomeris Meredith M

      Did anyone look at the model in the Givenchy gown and, thanks to that combover and whatever’s on her lip, immediately think “skinny Hitler!” 

    • Corsetmaker

      How to make couture look super cheap! 
      The Givenchy (which I love on the model) looks stripperish here.
      The Chanel looks like a teenage party dress.
      The Versace looks plain trashy (admittedly it’s not hard to make Versace look trashy).

    • http://www.facebook.com/tom.r.markiewicz Tom Markiewicz

      i think she looks damn stunning! and the pale lip helps highlight her eyes; she looks mesmerizing

    • eight_of_nine

      A lot of hate for the Chanel dress shot.  I’m surprised, I thought it was cute and unexpected.  We all know that Penelope can do “smoldering temptress” on a dime, but the casual, jaunty pose in the Chanel dress was refreshingly uncharacteristic.  At least, to me it was!

    • bitterk

      She’s stunning