In or Out: Emma Stone in Giambattista Valli

Posted on July 19, 2011

It’s times like these when we really feel like we’re doing God’s work here by bitching at unseen stylists for falling down on the job. Because when a girl as pretty as Emma Stone goes out in public in a multi-thousand dollar borrowed outfit chosen for her by a self-proclaimed expert and she looks like this:

Pin

Somebody needs to get sued.

PinEmma Stone attends the ‘Friends with Benefits’ premiere at Ziegfeld Theater in New York City in a Giambattista Valli dress paired with Christian Louboutin nude shoes.

PinGiambattista Valli Fall 2011 Collection/Model: Hanne Gaby Odiele (ELITE)

Pin

PinOh, you silly stylists. When will you learn that some items look good on a runway worn by a hungry model for 3 minutes but don’t necessarily work on people who aren’t thin for a living. Even if they’re almost as thin. Airbags on the hips? Save it for the editorials; no woman can make that work without either airbrushing or a strict diet of meals the size of a baby’s hand.

Not that Emma can’t make this work because she’s not thin enough. Heavens, no. It’s just that this dress is unflattering in a rather aggressive way (Waist? What waist? Look at my inflated hips instead!) and unless she’s willing to spend the night popping and locking like a runway model (and only spending a few minutes in view at a time), it’s never gonna work on her.

Also, stylists? “NUDE” SHOES DO NOT GO WITH EVERYTHING. They merely don’t clash with anything and that’s a huge difference that most of you don’t seem to get.

VOTE NOW!


IN! It’s sassy and bright! Lay off her!

OUT! I just want to cover her in a blanket and get her away from those mean photographers!


The Minion Opinion on Rosie Huntington-Whitely’s runaway boobs dress was a loud and near-unanimous OUT, which pleases us.

 

[Photo Credit: Jemal Countess and Stephen Lovekin/Getty Images, elle.com]

Please review our Community Guidelines before posting a comment. Thank you!

blog comments powered by Disqus