2011 Glamour Women of the Year Awards

Posted on June 08, 2011

Darlings, it was the Glamour Women Of The Year Awards at Berkeley Square Gardens in London, England and just enough celebrities showed up to call it a red carpet. Shall we? We shall!

Kim Kardashian in Dolce & Gabbana

It’s a pretty simple, but classically chic dress. The problems? We can see her belly button (along with a lot of pulling in the hips), the hair is a bit severe, and the earrings are a bit tacky.

Kristen Stewart in Balmain

She can only sustain the fake smiles for so long, but the fact that she’s even putting the attempt in to look not-pissed-off is a major accomplishment. The dress is pretty, but it’s too short and the shoes are too matchy. Hair and makeup look impressively (and somewhat uncharacteristically) polished.

Matthew Morrison

Ah, we suspect he’s gotten wind of the collective internet response to his previous red carpet appearances, which can be summed up thusly: “Ew.” He’s ditched the nighclub lothario look and now he’s working a cute nerd look. We know Brad Goreski, and you, sir, are no Brad Goreski. To be fair, he does look cute here. We like the hair and we like the idea behind the glasses, but looking at them in the second pic, they look a little … fussy.

Rosie Huntington-Whiteley in Stella McCartney

You know how you’re in a department store, pricing sheets, when you round the corner and accidentally wind up in the cheap aisle where all the sheets are REALLY SHINY and half of them are animal prints? And you say out loud, “GOD, no,” only to offend all the people in that aisle who are considering buying those highly flammable, rash-causing bargains? Yeah. It’s like that.

[Photo Credit: getty, wireimage]

    • Anonymous

      Oh Kardashian.  When will you go away? 

      Also, K-Stew, while I love that you’re clean and no longer pissed off looking all the time, please put the legs away for a while, won’t you? They’re skinny and pasty white and really not as great as you think they are.  Try a slightly new look. 

      • Anonymous

        Thank you…yes.  Her legs are blinding white.  I mean, so are mine, but I’m not running around in mini dresses getting my picture made. 

        • Anonymous

          thank GOD they’re not spray on orange I commend her on it. She looks fab

    • Anonymous

      Kim…always tacky, so the earrings are fitting.  ;) 

      Kristen’s dress is really cute…to bad she’s ruining it with lousy posture, depressing attitude and drab shoes.  She’s such a downer.

      Cheap, shiny, flammable bed sheets should never be worn in public…not even to a toga party.  Shame on Stella!  That fabric should be outlawed. 

      Why do I enjoy ripping on celebs…shame on me. ;)

    • Ryen DeStefano

      Kristen Stewart is the only girl with a smile in any of these pictures but we’re going to pick on her? Aren’t we the cool kids. 

      • Anonymous

        Yup! :)

    • Lauen newman

      Kristen’s dress is adorable, but too short. She does have long legs, though. And she really needs to push her shoulders back.
      Kim… blech. I hate it.
      Matthew still creeps me out. He always looks icky to me. 
      I can’t even comment on Rose’s outfit, I’d like to forget it.  It’s horrible. 

      • Anonymous

        This is everything I wanted to say, so I’ll say, “Yeah, what Lauen says.”

    • Anonymous

      The Kardashian looks better than I’ve ever seen her. Unfortunately from the back she probably has it all darted showing the under curve of her ass
      The Stewart gil looks fine, though the dress could be a little longer I agree.
      The guy with glasses looks cute, a little retro cute.
      The last one is just sad. What a mess.
      .

    • Anonymous

      Kristen Stewart needs to airbrush her legs or something if she’s going to do that look — or better yet, just stop doing that look. She doesn’t have the energy and healthy girl sexy factor for it.  Matthew Morrison shocks. He looks like he’s in costume and deeply uncomfortable playing the character. And that girl in the peach satin sheet looks like she was surgically altered to be giving permanent bitch face. That is one bad dress.

    • Anonymous

      What is Kardashian famous for?? I, too, wish she would go the way of Paris Hilton. To the bin of unremembered history.

    • Anonymous

      Kim K looks like she cannot move between the tight dress and hair and the frozen face.

    • http://profiles.google.com/stevens.abby A. W. Stevens

      Spot on boys!

    • Anonymous

      Matt Morrison and “Clark Rockerfeller” – separated at birth? You decide:
      http://bostonist.com/attachments/austinist_kerry/clark-rockefeller-ap.jpg

    • http://profiles.google.com/stevens.abby A. W. Stevens

      Spot on boys!  Thanks for the AM lols!

    • http://twitter.com/Littlegrr Mary Nau

      They ALL look like they are stumbling out of a Vegas lounge at 5:30 am.

    • Anonymous

      Somehow, I feel the need to speak for all Americans and express my apologies to the whole of the United Kingdom for the infliction of the Kardashians upon their fair soil. 

      –GothamTomato

      • Anonymous

        Ditto.

    • Anonymous

      Oh Kim just go up a size!
      Matthew- exploiting the geek look doesn’t make you any less creepy (See also: Kevin McHale)
      I can’t hate on Rosie- why the fuck would she care what she looks like when she has Jason Statham waiting at home for her.

    • Anonymous

      Well, if the idea is to dress like one of the sacred prostitutes of Astarte, then Kim, you nailed it.  Otherwise, just go home, permanently. Kirsten, clearly you’re a woman who hates her job a whole lot.  So, take your too short dress and your permascowl and go sell Orange Julius at a stand in some mall.  Matt, honey.  You don’t believe this look, neither do we.  The outfit is great, actually, you just don’t like it and it shows.  Rosie, Rosie, Rosie,….What are we to do with you?  That color just screams cheap lingerie, and no one of your age should look like they’ve had THAT much work done on their face.  Get a new make up man, NOW.

    • http://twitter.com/susanpcollier Susan Collier

      Kim Kardashian was awarded Entrepreneur of the Year? Shouldn’t that trophy go to Kris Jenner?

    • Anonymous

      What’s with this witchypoo titty-toppers on Kim Kardashian’s strangling tight dress?  I’m so SICK of that look. 

      I think Kristin Stewart looks cute – too short, yes, but an interesting print and at least she’s putting in an effort. I disagree about the makeup, though – she looks like she’s tumbled in from a French Quarter bender. 

      I think Matthew Morrison would look cute if he just took those stupid glasses off. He doesn’t need to wear glasses, right?  I hate the pretension of wearing fake glasses, these ones especially.

      I don’t know who that last gal is, but the cheap bed sheet analogy is right on. It’s a shame – with a nicer fabric, the dress would have some potential, though I guess that middle panel would be troubling no matter the rendering. I think her expression is hilarious.

      • http://visceralresponse.com Dina dV

        From the way the glasses alter the shape of his eyes (they’re not that large naturally), I’m pretty sure Morrison is wearing prescription lenses, so it’s not likely that he just picked them up to look like a “cute nerd.”  But it is quite likely that he’s half-blind.

        • Anonymous

          Except that if you walk into any optician’s these days, the range of frames is staggering. Even someone who needs a large lens has lots to choose from so, prescription or no, I think these were a (poor) choice.

          • http://visceralresponse.com Dina dV

            I was just pointing out that they’re not likely a new choice if they’re prescription.  And I think they suit him.  They’re certainly on trend and appear to be more or less the same frames that Sutan wore on RPDR. He looks fine in the first photo, it’s the weird half smile and the distorted, larger, eyes in the second that give him a vaguely Urkel appearance, but it’s not the frames fault as much as the prescription he seems to have to wear.

            • Anonymous

              Thanks for the call back to Raja.

    • Anonymous

      I think Kristen Stewart looks really cute here. She smiled at another recent event, too. Something is going on here and I think she should be given credit for her effort. Matthew Morrison has gone from sleaze bag to nerd virtually overnight and I don’t like him either way.

    • Anonymous

      Talking just about hair & makeup Kim Kardashian is going to be able to work that severe exotic beauty look (Cleopatra’s governess) for as long as her jaw line holds out. It is out-of-character elegant, but considering how heavily she may want to rely on it between 37 and final face lift, she may want to save it for rare occasions right now.

      Mr. Morrison is such an improvement that I will not quibble over his silly specs.

      Ms. H-W should fire whomever chose that dress for her. That dress is a perfect example of why some people find it hard to take Stella McCartney seriously.

    • http://twitter.com/Naddy_Lite Nadege

      Like the dress, but it is WAY too tight on Kim K.

    • Anonymous

      I honestly couldn’t get past Rosie What’s-her-name’s face to even notice she’s wearing a Stella McCartney. Good Lord. What did she do to that garment to make it look so bedraggled???

    • http://twitter.com/_ignorantbeauty Dee

      Rosie is gorgeous but she just looks so…cheap…all the time.  And KK needs to stop playing and go up a size.

    • Ted Kane

      I think MM’s picture here is what you want in the dictionary next to “adorkable.”

      • http://twitter.com/kmc1138 Kathleen Coyle

        I don’t agree, but I love the word.  ;-)

    • Anonymous

      I don’t what it is about Kim Kardashian. She has a very pretty face, lovely hair but some how, even in a designer dress and jewels she always looks tacky

      • Anonymous

        What it is is that the choice of dress & jewels are always over the top and usually in the tacky direction. As Sewing Siren indicated in her comment about how the rear of the dress was probably darted to hug her under-ass curve, she isn’t always just stuffing herself in clothes that are too small. She makes decisions about size and style and fit that she probably finds sexy & glamorous but which cross the line into cheap & tacky, IMO.

        Or, she may just be taking a sluttier version of Dolly Parton’s intentionally tacky approach, captured in the immortal line (possibly  misquoted) “It costs a lot of money to look this cheap”  but without any discernible talent to make it more palatable. (Though I don’t believe this. I think she thinks she looks fabulous)

    • http://diaryofaconsumerpunchingbag.blogspot.com/ Laura Ann Springer

      I just don’t see Kim’s appeal. Sure she has a body top that a majority of women out there have she just doesn’t dress her size, she dresses 2 sizes smaller. Kim here is a word for you, Girdle!

    • Anonymous

      Oy, the cheap peach satin sheets. Burn them. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12500056 Joseph Lamour

      I honestly didn’t recognize Kristen Stewart with a smile. 

    • Anonymous

      You didn’t even mention the reprehensible hem of Matthew’s pants.

    • Anonymous

      Did Rosie grab her gown from the bottom of the hamper at the last minute? Sure looks like it.

    • http://twitter.com/karenrubyleo Karen

      Does Kim K have to be invited to everything??? Matt Morrison looks good.

    • Anonymous

      I don’t understand why people wear Stella McCartney.  Her stuff always looks cheap and/or unflattering. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vienna-Marriott/100001636120960 Vienna Marriott

      I think Brad Goreski dresses foolishly.  I’ll take Matthew Morrison any day.

    • Anonymous

      I think KS looks really good although the dress is too short.  As for her legs, I’m kind of astonished that there are calls for her to get a spray tan – what’s wrong with having white legs, for heaven’s sake?  She has pale skin and she doesn’t want to look like a tangering, I say bravo, lady!  Now, just smile a little more often…

      • Anonymous

        and of course by that I meant that she doesn’t want to look like a tangerinE.

    • http://twitter.com/kmc1138 Kathleen Coyle

      Having never seen MM in glasses, and the fact that these are pretty ostentatious, I automatically assume they are fake and thusly automatically call douche.  But, I do like his hair (a lot) and the top 90% of his suit.

      I kinda like Kimmie’s earrings.  Not with the giant bangles, but I kinda like ‘em. 

    • Anonymous

      Matt M. can do no right in my book.  He’s a permanent douche.  Kstew looks pretty good though. 

    • Anonymous

      Kim, kim, kimmy. You USED to be a pretty girl.

    • Grace Ritt

      I know Kim Kardashian’s butt is really big and everything, but she doesn’t need to stretch couch fabric over it every day of her life just so we’re reminded how big it is.
      Also, K-Stew always looks more comfortable when she’s wearing pants. She should just wear a tux on the red carpet. It would be oh so controversial!

    • Anonymous

      Um, in what parallel universe should K2 and the vampire girl be even attending a “Glamour women of the year” event? Is that the best that Glamour can come up with really?

      Color me unimpressed.

    • Lisa

      Oh, I confess – I love the shiny sheets, I’ve always wanted them!  I just don’t like them in dress form!

    • Anonymous

      Not liking the glasses, Mr Schue.  I know you’re going for Nerdy/Hipster, but you’re looking more like Ida/Blankenship.

    • Anonymous

      again – wrong on KStew she looks young fresh and chic

    • Anonymous

      and PS She is STILL smiling in the second picture.

    • Anonymous

      And Car-Crashian  (mine)  wears more damn makeup than Ru-Paul

    • Anonymous

      I find it somewhat gratifying whenever I see a dress and hate it instantly and only then realize that it’s one of Stella McCartney’s. It makes me feel a lot better about thinking that she’s a complete hack and how she would have gotten NOWHERE in the industry without her father’s name and fortune.

      • Anonymous

        Ain’t it the truth. I haven’t gotten to the point where I can recognize a Stella design, but I almost always hate them on first sight. She makes hideous clothes.

    • Anonymous

      Did Kristen Stewart remain standing the entire evening?  Because if she sat down EVERYONE would see all of her EVERYTHING!  Very cute dress but VERY short.  And, as usual, Kim Kardashian looks overly trashy and trying WAY too hard to look “glamorous”.  That dress is just entirely too tight. 
      I can’t even go there about the tacky shiny sheet dress.